Drive Notes: 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer AWD RS

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

Today we have another bit of basic transport from Chevy, though this one is a step up in terms of price and size from the Trax I recently reviewed.

I dug the Trax's combination of utility, sport, and affordable price. Would I feel the same about the 2024 Chevrolet Trailblazer AWD RS?


Not quite.

That's not to say the Trailblazer is bad. I wouldn't kick it out of the garage. But it never charmed me the way the Trax did.


Pros

  • The handling is sporty-ish. Engaging relative to vehicle type, though not really all that fun. You can generate a few grins on an on-ramp, but not much beyond that.
  • Low-end grunt is fine.
  • The infotainment system is easy to learn.
  • The gauges are simple and easy to use, as are the HVAC controls.
  • I like the customization ability for the gauges, and except for one thing (see below), it's easy to do.
  • I like how Chevy sweeps the center screen into the dash.

Cons

  • The ride is a tad too stiff.
  • The 1.3-liter turbo engine is quiet at low RPMs but loud and thrashy when you summon the beans.
  • Low-end grunt may be fine, but there's not much verve beyond that.
  • While some interior materials are nice, there's too much hard plastic.
  • Rear headroom is a bit chopped for those over six-foot-one, though legroom is fine.
  • I somehow changed the main gauge graphic and couldn't change it back. That sort of thing shouldn't be puzzling.
  • The price is...well I don't think it's too expensive, given where the market is. But the as-tested price of $34K (or less) can get you a better vehicle -- including Chevy's own Trax, if you can live with something smaller. To be fair, this one was option laden, and the base price was a more reasonable $28,700.

That's it for this edition.

[Images © 2024 Tim Healey/TTAC.com]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • NJRide My mom had the 2005 Ford 500. The sitting higher appealed to her coming out of SUVs and vans (this was sort of during a flattening of the move to non-traditional cars) It was packaged well, more room than 90s Taurus/GM H-Bodies for sure. I do remember the CVT was a little buzzy. I wonder if these would have done better if gas hadn't spiked these and the Chrysler 300 seemed to want to revive US full-size sedans. Wonder what percent of these are still on the road.
  • 28-Cars-Later Mileage of 29/32/30 is pretty pitiful given the price point and powertrain sorcery to be a "hybrid". What exactly is this supposed to be?
  • MRF 95 T-Bird I own a 2018 Challenger GT awd in the same slate gray color. Paid $28k for it in late 2019 as a leftover on the lot. It’s probably worth $23k today which is roughly what this 2015 RT should be going for.
  • Mike978 There is trouble recruiting police because they know they won’t get support from local (Democratic) mayors if the arrests are on favored groups.
  • FreedMike I'm sure that someone in the U.S. commerce department during the 1950s said, "you know, that whole computer thing is gonna be big, and some country is going to cash in...might as well be us. How do we kick start this?" Thus began billions of taxpayer dollars being spent to develop computers, and then the Internet. And - voila! - now we have a world-leading computer industry that's generated untold trillions of dollars of value for the the good old US of A. Would "the market" have eventually developed it? Of course. The question is how much later it would have done so and how much lead time (and capital) we would have ceded to other countries. We can do the same for alternative energy, electric vehicles, and fusion power. That stuff is all coming, it's going to be huge, and someone's gonna cash in. If it's not us, you can damn well bet it'll be China or the EU (and don't count out India). If that's not what you want, then stop grumbling about the big bad gubmint spending money on all that stuff (and no doubt doing said grumbling on the computer and the Internet that were developed in the first place because the big bad gubmint spent money to develop them).
Next